Most of the analysis show that the Nexus One Google was a failure. They had to turn back time to market directly, eventually swallowing the telecom model as an intermediary between manufacturer and customer and not sold over too. I believe that despite all this, Nexus One was not a total failure, Mostly because it helped much to popularize Google Android to push its brand and creating too much noise and hype around him.
Nexus S: A Galaxy with Android 2.3
With Nexus S recurs with nuances. Does not sell the phone, but it relocates brand to an Android phone manufactured by a third party (in this case, Samsung). As terminal could summarize with a Samsung S Galaxy Android 2.3, with a features making it one of the best terminals can be purchased today and which is missing, especially recording HD video. As a tendency to score I would support the inclusion of NFC (one of the most interesting in 2011 bet that will be paying with your mobile).
Google's Android experience
Also interesting is how Google has focused on the Nexus S: The phone that offers "the full experience of Google's Android, unmodified by manufacturers and operators, without his shop with the latest operating system. These issues have become one of the constant debates about Android, the fragmentation in different versions of the system according to manufacturer's terminal and in different user experiences depending on the presence of different elements (buttons, physical keyboard) and different applications stores. Google gives the final part of the control of the Android experience (something that Microsoft has avoided with Windows Phone 7) And have our own line of terminals will be minimized safeguards as an intermediary for them.
